Back Pain

 

Spinal Manipulation: What You Need To Know | NCCIH

Results of a 2018 study with 750 active duty U.S. military personnel with low-back pain found that those who received chiropractic care in addition to usual care had better short-term improvements in low-back pain intensity and pain-related disability than those who only received usual medical care.

nccih.nih.gov › health › pain › spinemanipulation

 

Journal and Clinical Studies

Here are a few examples of results

The Nordic Maintenance Care program: Effectiveness of chiropractic maintenance care versus symptom-guided treatment for recurrent and persistent low back pain—A pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Andreas Eklund ,Irene Jensen,Malin Lohela-Karlsson, Jan Hagberg, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Alice Kongsted, Lennart Bodin, Iben Axén: Published: September 12, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203029PLOS

Abstract

Background

For individuals with recurrent or persistent non-specific low back pain (LBP), exercise and exercise combined with education have been shown to be effective in preventing new episodes or in reducing the impact of the condition. Chiropractors have traditionally used Maintenance Care (MC), as secondary and tertiary prevention strategies. The aim of this trial was to investigate the effectiveness of MC on pain trajectories for patients with recurrent or persistent LBP.

Method

This pragmatic, investigator-blinded, two arm randomized controlled trial included consecutive patients (18–65 years old) with non-specific LBP, who had an early favorable response to chiropractic care. After an initial course of treatment, eligible subjects were randomized to either MC or control (symptom-guided treatment). The primary outcome was total number of days with bothersome LBP during 52 weeks collected weekly with text-messages (SMS) and estimated by a GEE model.

Results

Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups. MC resulted in a reduction in the total number of days per week with bothersome LBP compared with symptom-guided treatment. During the 12 month study period, the MC group (n = 163, 3 dropouts) reported 12.8 (95% CI = 10.1, 15.5; p = <0.001) fewer days in total with bothersome LBP compared to the control group (n = 158, 4 dropouts) and received 1.7 (95% CI = 1.8, 2.1; p = <0.001) more treatments. Numbers presented are means. No serious adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion

MC was more effective than symptom-guided treatment in reducing the total number of days over 52 weeks with bothersome non-specific LBP but it resulted in a higher number of treatments. For selected patients with recurrent or persistent non-specific LBP who respond well to an initial course of chiropractic care, MC should be considered an option for tertiary prevention.

The Evolving Evidence on Chiropractors for Low Back Pain

New research suggests spinal adjustments may help.

The majority of people experience low back pain at some point during their lives—and it can be a miserable experience. Research shows that low back pain is the most common cause of missed work days.

To provide relief, doctors have typically prescribed oral medications. In some cases, surgery can repair back problems. But the traditional medical establishment has long frowned upon chiropractic care for lower back pain—until now.

Last month, the American College of Physicians issued a formal recommendation that doctors include spinal manipulation in the tools they use to treat back pain. The change comes after two new systematic reviews found a visit to the chiropractor can provide improvements for people with low back pain.  Let’s take a closer look at the evidence.

As recently as 2012, a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaborationanalyzed 20 randomized-controlled trials and found that spinal manipulations were no more effective than other intervention for back pain and no more effective than “sham” or fake spinal manipulations, where a medical provider pretended to adjust the spine. The authors did note that spinal manipulations were safe, and that the evidence in the review was of “low to very low quality.”

This year, a new review published in the Journal of the American Medical Association found the opposite—that spinal adjustments helped improve pain and function for people with low back pain. The authors evaluated a total of 26 randomized-controlled trials conducted since the previous Cochrane Collaboration review. Of them, 15 studies including more than 1,700 patients found evidence that spinal manipulation improved low back pain by about 10 points on a 100-point scale. Separately, 12 randomized-controlled trials including nearly 1,400 patients found that spinal manipulation improved the function of people with low back pain.

A second systematic review published this year in the Annals of Internal Medicine evaluated a wide range of alternative treatments for back pain, including tai chi, exercise, acupuncture, massage and spinal manipulation. The analysis found some evidence that spinal manipulation helps to reduce pain for people with chronic low back pain.

On the whole, the evidence suggests that seeing a chiropractor can reduce pain levels and increase function for people with chronic low back pain. There is another take-home message here too: The evidence on medical treatments—whether traditional or not—is constantly evolving as researchers better understand how to design studies and evaluate data. 

References

Chou, Roger, et al. “Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice GuidelineNonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain.” Annals of Internal Medicine (2017).

Paige, Neil M., et al. “Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.” Jama 317.14 (2017): 1451-1460.

Corporate

Location

Rua Alfredo Marceneiro 87, 1º DTO
Alcabideche
2645-538

(+351) 91 953 6695

info@adjustforlifecorporate.com

Follow Us